1. you use the word minerals mostly in the article, but at one point, you used "materials" - a very different word/meaning.
2. at one point you mentioned oil, which could be described as a "material" but not as a mineral, running out. That resource would be a whole different discussion, no?
Excellent.
But a couple little quips:
1. you use the word minerals mostly in the article, but at one point, you used "materials" - a very different word/meaning.
2. at one point you mentioned oil, which could be described as a "material" but not as a mineral, running out. That resource would be a whole different discussion, no?